The Jodi Picoult Collection #3 Read online

  Questions & Topics for Discussion

  1. When Delia learns she was kidnapped as a child, her choice of profession takes on a new significance. What motivated Delia to pursue a career in search-and-rescue? Does she view it differently once she knows about her past?

  2. Delia says that as children she, Fitz, and Eric each had their roles: “Fitz was the dreamer; I was the practical tactician. Eric, on the other hand, was the front man: the one who could charm adults or other kids with equal ease.” Have they continued these roles into adulthood? How so? Is each one comfortable in his or her role, or is there a longing to be something different?

  3. In one instance Eric muses that “there are people in this world who have done worse things than Andrew Hopkins.” What is your opinion of what Andrew did—taking Delia away from her mother and creating a new life for the two of them? From a legal standpoint, is he guilty of a crime? How about from a moral standpoint?

  4. Andrew himself says, “Does it really matter why I did it? By now, you’ve already formed your impression. You believe that an act committed a lifetime ago defines a man, or you believe that a person’s past has nothing to do with his future.” A person cannot change his or her past actions, but can they make up for the hurt they’ve caused by helping others? Does the good that Andrew has done for the town of Wexton and for the senior citizens in his care—not to mention the happy childhood he gave Delia—make up for or excuse his taking his daughter? What do you make of Elise’s remark to Andrew that Delia “turned out absolutely perfect”?

  5. Eric believes that he does not have “the experience or the wits or the confidence” to represent Andrew. Why then does he agree to take on the case? Why does he continue to act as Andrew’s attorney even when it causes tension between him and Delia?

  6. In one instance Delia says to Fitz about meeting her mother for the first time, “I want this to be perfect. I want her to be perfect. But what if she’s not? What if I’m not?” How does the reality measure up when she finally meets her mother? What kind of understanding do Delia and Elise come to? Why does Elise give Delia the “spell”—is it to help Andrew or her daughter?

  7. Delia believes “it takes two people to make a lie work: the person who tells it, and the one who believes it.” How do the characters in the novel, including Delia herself, prove this to be true?

  8. During the trial, Eric tells the court he is an alcoholic. What does the exchange between Eric and Delia while he is questioning her on the witness stand reveal about their relationship? Do they view each other differently after this exchange? As two people who love alcoholics, how does Delia’s treatment of Eric differ from Andrew’s treatment of Elise? Whose actions and reactions, given their partner’s disease, do you support?

  9. Eric says to Andrew, “Everyone deserves a second chance.” How does the idea of second chances play out in Vanishing Acts? Are there any characters who deserve a second chance and don’t get one? And conversely, are there any characters who do get a second chance—and squander it?

  10. Elise tells Delia, “If you had grown up with me, this is one of the things I would have tried to teach you: marry a man who loves you more than you love him. Because I have done both now, and when it is the other way around, there is no spell in the world that can even out the balance.” Discuss this in terms of Delia’s relationships with both Eric and Fitz. Which man do you think Delia should be with, and why?

  11. Both Delia and Sophie quickly develop a close relationship with Ruthann. When Ruthann commits suicide, Delia is there to witness it. Why does she not try to stop Ruthann? What does Delia come to realize about herself from this experience?

  12. Many of the chapters told from Andrew’s point of view occur while he is in prison, “where everyone reinvents himself.” What do these scenes, which depict in graphic detail the harsh realities of life behind bars, reveal about Andrew? What do they add to the overall storyline?

  13. Right versus wrong is a dominant theme in Vanishing Acts—whether Andrew was right or wrong to kidnap Delia, whether Eric is right or wrong to hide his continued drinking from Delia, whether Delia is right or wrong not to stop Ruthann. How do the multiple perspectives in the story blur these lines and show how two people can view the same situation completely differently? Were there any instances where you changed your mind about something in the story after reading a different character’s viewpoint?

  14. Fitz tells Delia, “I think you’re angry at yourself, for not being smart enough to figure this out all on your own. . . . If you don’t want someone to change your life for you again, Dee, you’ve got to change it yourself.” How do Fitz’s words make Delia see her circumstances differently?

  15. Ruthann introduces Delia to the Hopi creation myth, which suggests that humans have outgrown the world four times already, and are about to inhabit a fifth. Do most people outgrow their origins? Is reinvention part of the human experience? How do each of the characters’ actions support or disprove this?

  16. At one point, we learn that Fitz has not been writing about Andrew’s trial, but about Delia. In fact, when he reads the first few pages to her, we can recognize them as the first few pages of this book. How does this affect the story you read? Is Fitz a reliable narrator?

  17. Much is made of the nature of memory—whether it is stored physically, whether it can be conjured at will, whether it can be organically triggered or planted. Ultimately, do you believe Delia’s recovered memories at the end of the book? Why or why not?

  18. How are each of the main characters—Delia, Fitz, Eric, Andrew, and Elise—most changed by the events that take place? Where do you envision the characters five years from now?

  1230 Avenue of the Americas

  New York, NY 10020

  www.SimonandSchuster.com

  This book is a work of fiction. Names, characters, places and incidents are products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Any resemblance to actual events or locales or persons, living or dead, is entirely coincidental.

  Copyright © 2005 by Jodi Picoult

  All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this book or portions thereof in any form whatsoever. For information address Atria Books, 1230 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020

  The Library of Congress has cataloged the hardcover edition as follows:

  Picoult, Jodi, 1966–

  Vanishing acts: a novel / by Jodi Picoult.—1st Atria Books hardcover ed.

  p. cm.

  1. Young women—Fiction. 2. Adult children of divorced parents—Fiction. 3. Fathers and daughters—Fiction. 4. Parental kidnapping—Fiction. 5. Divorced fathers—Fiction. 6. New Hampshire—Fiction. 7. Arizona—Fiction. I. Title.

  PS3566.I372V36 2005

  813’.54—dc22

  2004059454

  ISBN-13: 978-0-7434-5454-4

  ISBN-10: 0-7434-5454-5

  ISBN-13: 978-0-7434-5455-1 (Pbk)

  ISBN-13: 978-1-41650-670-6 (ebook)

  ISBN-10: 0-7434-5455-3 (Pbk)

  This Washington Square Press trade paperback edition November 2005

  ATRIA BOOKS and colophon are registered trademarks of Simon & Schuster, Inc.

  For Nick and Alex Adolph (and their parents, Jon and Sarah) because I promised that one day I would.

  CONTENTS

  Acknowledgments

  Prologue

  Chapter 1

  Chapter 2

  Chapter 3

  Chapter 4

  Chapter 5

  Chapter 6

  Chapter 7

  Chapter 8

  A Readers Club Guide

  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

  This was a massive undertaking, and it would have been an impossible one without the help of my Dream Team of research helpers.

  My usual suspects: Betty Martin, Lisa Schiermeier, Nick Giaccone, Frank Moran, David Toub, Jennifer Sternick, Jennifer Sobel, Claire Demarais, JoAnn Mapson, Jane Picoult.

  Two ladies with the grace to help rape victims find a